 | | Re: A slice of tudor —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | (...) How thin IS it? I get something like 3 studs in back? That may be a LITTLE too thin... :-) I like the way this is going though! Next you need to make one that is concave instead of convex! (20 years ago, 3-Sep-04, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: A slice of tudor —Jason Spears
| | | | | (...) Yeap, 3 studs in back. I wanted to go thinner, but the bricks didn't seem to want to work well that way. It's cozy inside, not cramped. (...) On my to do list. I'm pondering some smaller, but flatsided buildings to go along with them, but (...) (20 years ago, 3-Sep-04, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: A slice of tudor —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) I think it may be helpful to have the final assortment be some multiple of 90 degrees when you add up all their angles, so that they can be used to make a tight block that doesn't have any angle gaps. I may look to making sure some of my (...) (20 years ago, 3-Sep-04, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: A slice of tudor —Jason Spears
| | | | | (...) I'm not sure that's necessary or even possible. First it would require me to figure out what angles I already have, I don't know this, nor did I think it was important. Second then I would feel constrained to build more just to achieve this (...) (20 years ago, 4-Sep-04, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
| | | | | | |
