 | | Motion considerations when RCXing The Improved and New Old Miller Gustav's Post Mill —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | Still more snippage. With sone new crossposts! (...) Im not so keen on motor wires if they can be avoided. I'm thinking that if you were clever you could have as much rotation as you like, because you could house the motors in the base. Use a (...) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Motion considerations when RCXing The Improved and New Old Miller Gustav's Post Mill —Tobbe Arnesson
| | | | | (...) Much snippage. Getting a powered axle through a turntable is a non-issue. Getting two through it is another thing, although not hard to do. I think the best implementation of such a device is in Jennifer Clark's fine JCB: (URL) under the (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Motion considerations when RCXing The Improved and New Old Miller Gustav's Post Mill —Jason J. Railton
| | | | | (...) gears and clutches for that. I've tried a crude version locking differential boxes together, and driving off the gears on the ends though. Okay, two ways to get a simple two-shaft concentric drive: The first is, as mentioned above, use a (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.technic, FTX)
| | | | | | |
