Subject:
|
Re: here is a cool castle idea
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Oct 2003 10:46:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
879 times
|
| |
|
|
"Jonathan Wilson" <jonwil@tpgi.com.au> wrote in message
news:HMHGxM.1qoD@lugnet.com...
> I have seen several castle toys that are basicly a bunch of different
> "modules" (like wall pieces, towers, turrets, gates etc) plus some people
> to put on those modules and then an attacking army (with siege engines • etc)
> to attack it.
> You can arrange the modules in any way you like to produce different • castles.
>
> Why not do that for LEGO castle.
> Basicly, you could have each module (a tower, a turret, a gate, a wall, a
> catapult, a siege tower, whatever) as a seperate set.
> So you could have small module sets and larger sets with multiple modules
> (say a "complete" castle in one set). Each set would include figs, weapons • etc.
> Also, other figs and weapons would be available in minifig packs of • various
> kinds (e.g. "buy this pack and get a complete knight on horseback with all
> the trimmings" or "buy this pack and get 4 archers" or whatever)
>
> Any castleheads want to comment on this?
Wasnt that the idea in the King Leo's castle of poop?? and the Ninja castle.
OK so it wasnt very well done, but turrets and the like were fragilely held
on with 1x1 rounds, the idea being you can swap and change them about. yes
it would be a good idea if done well, Lego seemed to use it as an excuse to
produce poop'y flimsy structures tho, that fall down when you look at them
--
James Stacey
------
www.minifig.co.uk
Lugnet Member #925
I'm a citizen of Legoland travellin' Incommunicado
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
