To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / 16994
16993  |  16995
Subject: 
Weekly castle review (or is it?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.castle
Date: 
Thu, 29 May 2003 23:23:54 GMT
Viewed: 
578 times
  
I check out the weekly castle review from time to time, and the latest is a bit puzzling...

The latest review, of 6088, includes the statement “it would be apparently obvious that a wide variety of traps and snares would be set up for the oblivious intuder, but surprisingly, these were pretty much absent from the model, besides a small catapult and a trigger for falling rocks.”

Has the reviewer built the set? Or even seen it?

IIRC this set has one of the more better traps around - four katanas which swing down to impale the oblivious intuder - but the reviewer fails to note it (or even notice it, it seems).


Cheers

Richie Dulin



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Weekly castle review (or is it?)
 
(...) That's just one additional trap, however. (it might affect the rating by a point or so.) Hmm...that might have been one of my 'oh damn, how could I miss that one' errors. Sorry for that...and bear with me here! For the last several weeks, I've (...) (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.castle, FTX)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR