 | | Re: Who is bad in Castle Lego ?
|
|
(...) Hi Michael, 2 things: 1. Check this discussion on the matter from the previous time some1 ask that question: (URL) The way I use to look at it (no one have to agree of course): 1984-1987 Crusders (Good) vs Black Falcons (Bad) 1988-1991 Robin (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Who is bad in Castle Lego ?
|
|
(...) Yes - set 6087 supports this, but also: Fright Knights (Bad) vs Royal Knights (Good) in set 6097 and: Fright Knights (Bad) vs some other generic knightly fellow that I can't place (presumably Good) in set 6047/6099 Cheers Richie (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Who is bad in Castle Lego ?
|
|
(...) That knight also belongs to the Royal Knights (the same one from 6090). Love LEGO Levo Castle Yaron "Webrain" Dori (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Who is bad in Castle Lego ?
|
|
(...) I guess that's why they call the set 6099, "Traitor Transport", because the Royal Knight has changed allegiences and joined his enemy (the Fright (k)Nights)in fine "benedict arnold" style. :) Ben (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Who is bad in Castle Lego ?
|
|
Hello! (...) I do not agree at all :-) (...) In these years there were no "Good" and "Bad", there were just knights from different clans, who sometimes made war on each other, sometimes lived in peace together. BTW the Crusaders are more aggressive (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Who is bad in Castle Lego ?
|
|
Hi again (...) You can look at it that way too I guess (...) Don't agree. I mean it's true that Crusaders had more battle machines, but they more in everything. Black Falcons had only 6 LEGO sets while the Crusaders had like 14. They had more in (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Who is bad in Castle Lego ?
|
|
Hello! [Crusaders vs. Black Falcons] (...) That's true. And this is why I always preferred Black Falcons rather than Crusaders. BFs were the underdogs that I've sympathy for. (...) Hehe, I can understand this point of view. Crusaders look noble with (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Who is bad in Castle Lego ?
|
|
(...) Just another word on the subject,you can also of course see it as the TLC repeating way. I mean take for example LEGO City, how many Airports, Hospitals, Fire Departments, Police... they made during the last 20 years. But of course a kid who (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Who is bad in Castle Lego ?
|
|
(...) I've always thougth of the Lego castle series evolving in time: starting just after 1066 with the military Norman fortresses of England, continuing with the more inhabitable medieval knights castles (around 1300), and ending so far with the (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
