Subject:
|
Re: Who is bad in Castle Lego ?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Feb 2003 01:29:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
773 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Richie Dulin writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Yaron Dori writes:
> > 1996-1998 Forestmen (Good) vs Fright Knights (Bad)
> Yes - set 6087 supports this, but also:
> Fright Knights (Bad) vs Royal Knights (Good) in set 6097
> and:
> Fright Knights (Bad) vs some other generic knightly fellow that I can't
> place (presumably Good) in set 6047/6099
That knight also belongs to the Royal Knights (the same one from 6090).
Love LEGO Levo Castle
Yaron "Webrain" Dori
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Who is bad in Castle Lego ?
|
| (...) I guess that's why they call the set 6099, "Traitor Transport", because the Royal Knight has changed allegiences and joined his enemy (the Fright (k)Nights)in fine "benedict arnold" style. :) Ben (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Who is bad in Castle Lego ?
|
| (...) Yes - set 6087 supports this, but also: Fright Knights (Bad) vs Royal Knights (Good) in set 6097 and: Fright Knights (Bad) vs some other generic knightly fellow that I can't place (presumably Good) in set 6047/6099 Cheers Richie (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
