 | | Re: Rate the factions —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | (...) delibrately go through giving everything a zero and your favorite a 10 just to make it look good. I can tell when you have done it (and since I'm posting this, guess what someone has done). Bruce (22 years ago, 13-Sep-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Rate the factions —David Eaton
|
| | | | | (...) This is indeed a problem. I noticed this quite a while back with set ratings, too. Someone went through and rated just about all the classic castle sets "0". Now, given that there were at least 50 votes or so for each set, it didn't affect the (...) (22 years ago, 13-Sep-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Rate the factions —Saskia van Doesburg
|
| | | | I can tell when you have done it (and since I'm (...) I think I did, but I really didn't mean to. Maybe it was easier if you could rank the figs from high to low. Now I gave my favourite themes 10 points and the themes I didn't care about zero or (...) (22 years ago, 13-Sep-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Rate the factions —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) I thought people would find it a pain to rank that many factions and keep track of where they placed them. Further, I thought ranking might create some artificially large gaps. Perhaps the rating option needs a "No opinion" or perhaps the (...) (22 years ago, 13-Sep-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
