 | | Re: Problem with Seam Width —Jake McKee
|
| | | (...) Sorry to do it, but I am replying to my own post with a solution. Note to self: LGEO library parts DO NOT work with Mega-POV find_edges.... Jake --- Jake McKee AFOL LUGNET Member #211 (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Problem with Seam Width —Gary Blessing
|
| | | | | Jake McKee <sink@countersinkdg.com> wrote in message news:GryFxr.E49@lugnet.com... (...) width. (...) Realy? *sigh*, well at least at least I won't have to download Mega-POV again. I was going to use them together for instructions for my first (...) (23 years ago, 23-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Problem with Seam Width —Jake McKee
|
| | | | | | (...) If you are thinking about making instructions, I would strongly suggest at least checking out MEGAPOV's find_edges function. Even without using the LGEO library, the instructions output is far and away the best I have seen so far for (...) (23 years ago, 23-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Problem with Seam Width —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | (...) The LGEO parts have rounded edges. That's why it doesn't make sense to have a "seam" between the parts. And Mega-POV will not be able to identify the edges simply because there are no edges! I you want to use the edges highlighting function in (...) (23 years ago, 23-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| | | | |
