Subject:
|
Re: There has to be an easier way.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.mlcad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:01:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1744 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
"Michael Lachmann" <m.lachmann@xpoint.at> wrote in message
news:G2ErpI.5DH@lugnet.com...
> You can drop the part to the part list,
I assume you mean to the list of parts in the model. When I do this, the
part is inserted at 0,-10,0. I have the Document Settings for new
unplaced elements set to "Same as previous"
> or add it from the menu,
This works, but it is time consuming to select the part from the numbered
list.
> providing you configured it correctly in the settings.
Is there a setting that I'm missing?
-John Van
>
> Michael
>
> John VanZwieten <john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
> G2Dz1F.ADL@lugnet.com...
> > Is there a way to drag a part from the part window into the model, and
> > have it put in the same location of the previous part? Every time I drag
> > a part into the overhead view, it ends up at z=0.
> >
> > -John Van
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: There has to be an easier way.
|
| I guess it's somehow strange to use ... previous part is the part currently selected when you insert the new one :-/ so please try selecting the part which position should be inherited ... then add the new part by dragging it to the "list of parts (...) (24 years ago, 16-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: There has to be an easier way.
|
| You can drop the part to the part list, or add it from the menu, providing you configured it correctly in the settings. Michael John VanZwieten <john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag: G2Dz1F.ADL@lugnet.com... (...) (24 years ago, 14-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
10 Messages in This Thread: ![There has to be an easier way. -John VanZwieten (13-Oct-00 to lugnet.cad.mlcad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: There has to be an easier way. -Jay Cal (14-Oct-00 to lugnet.cad.mlcad)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: There has to be an easier way. -Michael Lachmann (14-Oct-00 to lugnet.cad.mlcad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: There has to be an easier way. -Michael Lachmann (16-Oct-00 to lugnet.cad.mlcad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: There has to be an easier way. -Royce Fay (16-Oct-00 to lugnet.cad.mlcad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: There has to be an easier way. -John VanZwieten (16-Oct-00 to lugnet.cad.mlcad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: There has to be an easier way. -Michael Lachmann (18-Oct-00 to lugnet.cad.mlcad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: There has to be an easier way. -Royce Fay (18-Oct-00 to lugnet.cad.mlcad)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: There has to be an easier way. -John VanZwieten (18-Oct-00 to lugnet.cad.mlcad)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|