| |
At 10:24 AM 12/09/1999 , Steve Bliss wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney wrote:
> Try using terms like:
>
> LDraw -- a (mostly historical) software package for creating LEGO-type
> models on your computer.
Yes.
> ldraw.org -- the group formerly known as the L-CAD mailing list. A (very)
> loosely organized group of people, working to enhance and evangelize LDraw
> and its parts library.
Personally, I think the term 'ldraw.org' refers to the actual website. The
group of people could remain 'L-CAD' if desired, or 'The LDraw
Organization,' or something completely different. On the site, I refer to
ldraw.org as the site.
> Official ldraw.org Parts Updates -- collections of part files for LDraw,
> which have been reviewed and analyzed before release upon an unsuspecting net.
Yes.
> LDraw Parts Library -- includes both files from LDraw and OLPU's.
> LDraw Compatible Program -- program which works with or on LDraw files.
Yes. Yes.
> > I think it prudent to define and publish the
> > meaning of the word 'LDraw' when used on its own so it does not become a
> > generic term like 'Xerox,' 'Kleenex,' or 'Coke.'
>
> I know what you mean--in our house, we regularly use LDraw as a
> verb: "I've got to ldraw that model before I take it apart.", "I haven't
> ldrawn that one yet.", etc. These days, we're usually using MLCad for
> editing and displaying models, but the process is still "ldrawing".
I know from experience what you're referring to here :) I don't see any
problem with using the word 'LDraw' as a verb. Sure, Xerox might, but
we're not protecting any profits, etc.
> I could understand the argument for lumping the entire parts library (James'
> files, plus the ldraw.org updates) with the original software, and calling it
> all "LDraw". But not other software.
Would something like 'The LDraw System' work for referring to .dat format
files for parts and models, along with a piece of software which utilizes it?
> > How should
> > ldraw.org and other websites refer to the word 'LDraw?'
>
> With extreme reverence. ;)
:)
> > Another question: Because of the ambiguity of the .dat file extension on
> > computer systems, should we develop a new file extension that newer editors
> > can use?
>
> People are free to use whatever file extension they want. LDraw doesn't care.
Ok.
> My thought is that a new model-file extension would be a good idea, but is it
> really necessary to encode it in the ldraw.org pages? All the website can
> do is evangelize and bless a new standard. It can't make any programmers
> change their programs to match.
Obviously it cannot impose anything, but advocating a standard (and perhaps
if a programmer adds this in off the bat) may influence the future of LDraw
files.
> Speaking of the website, one thing www.ldraw.org really needs is a more
> complete list of the various pieces of software available.
I couldn't agree more :) What I want is for software authors to submit the
form to get a download page on ldraw.org. I'd prefer not to only link
off-site, but provide software for download on site as well as link to the
authors' site somewhere else. I believe the template is at
http://www.ldraw.org/download/template.html (but I'm not sure). Sometime
we should get an easy form up to submit.
-Tim
http://www.zacktron.com
http://www.ldraw.org
AIM: timcourtne
ICQ: 23951114
If you don't believe in Gosh, you'll go to Heck, where you'll face eternal
darnation.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: What is 'LDraw?'
|
| (...) That would be great! I'm not sure if Jacob would want someone else's CGI running on the server, why not ask him. Here's the correct link: (URL) you'd like, just work with the fields (I believe they're commented in the HTML source) and we'll (...) (26 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | What is 'LDraw?'
|
| Because of some of the more recent advancements in software which utilizes the .dat file, I have been thinking about what LDraw *is*. I think we should firmly establish what LDraw is if there are going to [and there will] be more advancements in (...) (26 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
