| |
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
[snip]
> > I am not sure if the current version just needs some minor
> > fixes or a complete rewrite based on lessons learned.
Tim Courtney replied:
> What's wrong with the current version? What problems (besides downtime)
> have been experienced?
When it still was accessible for me, I've been using the Parts Tracker a lot.
In my opinion the latest version of this site was working quite well already,
especially since Zach added the ability to delete your own records. I feel
there is not very much left to improve on the program. The only missing option
I can think of, is a routine that copies a parts description from the "Wanted
Parts"- list into the "Tracked Parts"-list. At the same time this option should
add a label to the original record in the "Wanted Parts"-list, stating that
someone has claimed to model the part.
Earlier, I asked:
> > Jacob, do you mean with this that you don't experience any
> > problems with the LDraw Parts Tracker?
Jacob Sparre Andersen replied:
> No. It hasn't disappeared, but it definitely appears that it
> needs to be fixed/improved/updated.
Well, for me, trying to view the site with Microsoft Internet Explorer, the
Parts Tracker has been permanently down since the end of October. I realy miss
it.
Greetings, Manfred Moolhuysen.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
4 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
