Subject:
|
Re: New license for the LDraw All-In-One installer
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:45:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
17639 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Willy Tschager wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Ahui Herrera wrote:
> > > In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Willy Tschager wrote:
> > > > In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Ahui Herrera wrote:
> >
> > Ahui,
> >
> > Jeronen says NO. but I did a merge on the files. The difference between 3.5 and
> > the file posted above are:
> >
> > ********************* PovRay 3.5 *************************
> >
> > #ifdef(Colors_Inc_Temp)
> > // do nothing
> > #else
> > #declare Colors_Inc_Temp = version;
> >
> > #version 3.5
> >
> > ********************* LDraw Color ************************
> >
> > #ifndef(Colors_Inc_Temp)
> >
> > #declare Colors_Inc_Temp = version;
> > #version 3.5;
> >
> > **********************************************************
> >
> > If the file posted above is correct the difference is nothing more than a bugfix
> > and I cannot see any reason why I would need a third party permission for a fix.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> Why do you call this a bug fix? Is #ifndef not a valid POV command? Both
> versions do exactly the same thing, as far as I can tell, just via #ifdef for
> POV 3.5, and #ifndef for LDraw.
>
> --Travis
You are right, it is not a bugfix, but better coding. I have installed on my
machine version 3.1, 3.5 and 3.6 of POV-Ray and all have the same "bad" coding
line. So there have to be somebody who has changed that, but I think this do not
affect any liscence.
cu
mikeheide
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
