 | | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
|
|
(...) I accept. Thanks. However, I should mention that contrary to what William stated above, I don't meet the requirements for "parts author", and may not meet the "parts reviewer" requirements. (I'm not 100% sure I've submitted five reviews total, (...) (17 years ago, 5-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
|
|
(...) I do agree it is ambiguous (and can't actually remember what was meant even though I believe I drafted that statement...) and the wording should be tightened. Given the non-exceptional rules I assume it means for the duration of being a parts (...) (17 years ago, 5-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
|
|
(...) I would like to think that it meant "5 in the last one year", since we want people who are CURRENTLY active in the LDraw community. That is also the way that I naturally read the sentence. But it can definitely be read either way. And given (...) (17 years ago, 5-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC)
|
|
Sorry for that mistake W ----- Original Message ----- From: "Travis Cobbs" <tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com> To: <lugnet.cad.dev.org....ugnet.com> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 5:39 AM Subject: Re: Call for Nominations: 2007/2008 LDraw.org Standards (...) (17 years ago, 5-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
