 | | Re: RACHAL Changeover —Travis Cobbs
|
| | | (...) Being a vi user, I'm drawn to the natural conclusion that emacs must be the culprit ;-). (On a more serious note, I actually don't know what emacs does with line endings. I know that vi leaves them alone unless you specifically tell it to (...) (17 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: RACHAL Changeover —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | (...) You have my pity ;) (...) I think it leaves them alone. Certainly I've never had any troubles with it converting one way or the other before. If you edit a Windows text file on a UNIX emacs it will show the extra ^R (or whichever is unused on (...) (17 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RACHAL Changeover —Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) Which may or may not be an issue. It's irrelevant if you're just editing existing lines, but if you add new ones, vi will add them in the file-native format (CRLF for a DOS file), while emacs will add them in the machine-native format. Dan (17 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
