 | | Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version —Timothy Gould
|
| | | (...) Perhaps people would prefer if we changed that paragraph to something like this in the README Tim ---- LDraw.org is the sole entity responsible for enforcement of the Parts Library copyrights. LDraw.org does not consider rendered images or (...) (18 years ago, 6-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) I think that is more workable, since it limits the README to addressing the interpretation of terminology in the license, rather than elaborating/modifying the actual license. Steve (18 years ago, 6-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | | (...) I do think we should try to get it enshrined in the Constitution too. I really doubt it's ever going to be an issue but it should go some way to assuaging people's worries. Tim (18 years ago, 6-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version —Dean Earley
|
| | | | (...) Wouldn't this include modifying/converting...publishing the dat files themselves (a true derivative work)? (18 years ago, 7-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | (...) Probably... maybe "LDraw.org does not consider LDraw model files (defined as being MPDs or LDR files whose main purpose is creating a model, ultimate discretion lies with the current LDraw SteerCo) to be derivative works of the Parts Library." (...) (18 years ago, 7-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | | (...) of course with the bit about rendered images still left in... sorry. It's late :) Tim (18 years ago, 7-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version —Don Heyse
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, I think the meaning was there, but the language was still a bit unclear. Here's a nice place to look for ideas on how to rework the language. (URL) section on Software is probably the closest match, and I believe this is the key (...) (18 years ago, 7-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | (...) There is one aspect that I am a little worried about and it deals with unofficial files... we can make it clear what a model file is (references to parts only) but then we have the problem that it is considered good practise to include (...) (18 years ago, 7-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Contributor Agreement License details - updated version —Dean Earley
|
| | | | (...) I'm not sure about the exact text but id state derived works as "containing the original file or visual representation/rendering of..." This happily excludes models (except where they include unofficial parts), but includes all renders of both (...) (18 years ago, 7-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
