 | | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
Hello, (...) Thanks for the information! I will use this syntax then. What exactly is a "shortcut"? I'm still trying to write a parts editor and now I implemented the new part header system in the program. I hope it won't change again! Leg Godt- (...) (18 years ago, 15-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Non-CA parts rewrite
|
|
See also (URL) need of re-writing (total 88) Type Number PT? Name p 4-4con0.dat N Cone 0 x 1.0 p connect5.dat N Technic Pin 1.0 with Base Collar and Slots parts 2336p35.dat Y Space Nose with Black/Silver "V" Pattern parts 2336p36.dat Y Space Nose (...) (18 years ago, 15-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
(...) I would like to amend the Parts Tracker so that authors would not need to worry about this and the submit process would standardise this line. Chris (18 years ago, 15-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Releases and the CA
|
|
(...) --snip-- Just redid and submitted 32523 Tim (18 years ago, 14-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
(...) the LSC hasn't voted on this issue yet and dropped the argument during discussion to speed up the voting on the actual header (which was a wise approach). anyway, the proposal is as following: 0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part| Unofficial_Subpart| (...) (18 years ago, 14-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
