 | | Re: No mention of scale in file format doc —Orion Pobursky
|
| | | (...) All BFC requires is uniform, non-bowtie winding. While currently the spec doesn't require winding, I see no reason not to revise the new spec to make it a requirement. On the flip side there are many file still left in the loibrary with a (...) (20 years ago, 25-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: No mention of scale in file format doc —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) But what's required by/for the parts library is different from what the basic file format spec lays out. I think it is better (more flexible, easier to write) for the file format to be flexible. When I'm doing rough coding of new parts, I (...) (20 years ago, 25-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: No mention of scale in file format doc —Orion Pobursky
|
| | | | (...) I see your point. I changed the wording and removed the images. -Orion (20 years ago, 26-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: No mention of scale in file format doc —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Thank you very much! Can you also add similar text under linetype 3? Steve (20 years ago, 28-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| | | | |
