Subject:
|
Re: Moving the License Forward
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:16:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2549 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Jeff Findley wrote:
> I would hope that any changes made to a part file would include attribution
> to the original author(s). Perhaps this should be spelled out in the
> license?
That might be a good idea. We do have standing policies for most situations;
everything from making minor fixes to using someone else's code in a new part to
rearranging an existing file into new file(s) to entirely rewriting an existing
part.
We might also want to consider updating the format of the 0 Name: line, to use
the author's ldraw.org userid instead of (or in addition to) a real name.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
| (...) Standing policies, yes, but programmatic enforcement, no. Too much in this arena relies on you and I applying those policies correctly in the parts updates. And there is always going to have to be some flexibility that needs admin judgement. (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
| (...) I would hope that any changes made to a part file would include attribution to the original author(s). Perhaps this should be spelled out in the license? Other than this one little issue, I like what I see. Putting these two licenses into (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
139 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
