Subject:
|
Re: Moving the License Forward
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:46:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2549 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Peter Howkins wrote:
> Could your explain your thinking behind why you believe this second
> license is necessary and what it provides beyond asking an author
> (when they submit work to the parts tracker) to place their work
> under the Share Alike license?
There has been a lot of discussion on this already. We carefully considered all
the discussion and decided that two licenses offer the best approach for maximum
flexibility.
The text of the posted draft license itself highlights a key thing that just
informally asking doesn't provide... a mechanism for formalising changes and
formalising author approval of them.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
| (...) (URL) I can see no difference in the human readable summary, it's likely the differences are in the legal version. This seems a good an open license. (...) Could your explain your thinking behind why you believe this second license is (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
139 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
