|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
> Just for the record: IANAL
> Mine. LDraw files are source code (at least according to
> the definition in the LGPL). And unless you consider
> rendering a specific kind of compilation, LGPL would not
> allow you to do anything useful with a parts library covered
> by it. Since the parts library is "linked" statically into
> the renderings, and cannot be substituted after the
> rendering has been made, the clause cited above takes
> effect.
I don't know. I think when something is statically linked you
can recover the original code with a disassembler. It's really
still there in a different form. There's no way to disassemble
a picture into the ldraw code without using the ldraw code itself,
and that would be cheating. Therefore it's a product of the ldraw
code, just like a calculation is the product of a mathlib.
For the record. IANL either.
Enjoy,
Don
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: License Intent
|
| Just for the record: IANAL (...) Mine. LDraw files are source code (at least according to the definition in the LGPL). And unless you consider rendering a specific kind of compilation, LGPL would not allow you to do anything useful with a parts (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
139 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|