To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 3192
3191  |  3193
Subject: 
Re: License Intent
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Sun, 13 Jun 2004 12:54:48 GMT
Viewed: 
3555 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
Just for the record: IANAL
Mine.  LDraw files are source code (at least according to
the definition in the LGPL).  And unless you consider
rendering a specific kind of compilation, LGPL would not
allow you to do anything useful with a parts library covered
by it.  Since the parts library is "linked" statically into
the renderings, and cannot be substituted after the
rendering has been made, the clause cited above takes
effect.


I don't know.  I think when something is statically linked you
can recover the original code with a disassembler.  It's really
still there in a different form.  There's no way to disassemble
a picture into the ldraw code without using the ldraw code itself,
and that would be cheating.  Therefore it's a product of the ldraw
code, just like a calculation is the product of a mathlib.

For the record.  IANL either.

Enjoy,

Don



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: License Intent
 
Just for the record: IANAL (...) Mine. LDraw files are source code (at least according to the definition in the LGPL). And unless you consider rendering a specific kind of compilation, LGPL would not allow you to do anything useful with a parts (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

139 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR