Subject:
|
Re: what name do we use for sets like 1749?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 13 Jul 1999 23:48:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
897 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
At 06:21 PM 7/13/99 , Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> for sets that are genuinly unnamed, what do we do?
We could add something like:
0 XXXX (No Official Name Given)
in the header to replace the set name.
All more things I need to take into account when I make online instructions
for creating models for the OMR... (but keep sending them, lets fix all
the holes here)
-Tim <><
http://www.zacktron.com
AIM: timcourtne
ICQ: 23951114
If someone tells you you're worth your weight in gold, fatten up.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: what name do we use for sets like 1749?
|
| (...) #1749 has no official name (according to the polybag). In this case, however, there is a sister-set #1806 which came in a box and it was named "Aquanaut Paravane" (not sure how someone figured this out, since that's not on the box...maybe they (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
4 Messages in This Thread: ![what name do we use for sets like 1749? -Jonathan Wilson (13-Jul-99 to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: what name do we use for sets like 1749? -Todd Lehman (13-Jul-99 to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: what name do we use for sets like 1749? -Jonathan Wilson (13-Jul-99 to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|