| |
In lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, Willy Tschager wrote:
| |
looks intriguing! the only thing I do not properly understand is the size
statement. this simplyfied statement makes sense for ordinary plates and
bricks of square or rectangular shape, but not wings, wedges, corners ...
|
Things that are unapplicable for a specific part (model, object etc.) should not
be used with it. For example, you can’t rotate an Axle--Axlehole connection
because it can slide only. Therefore, all statements, functions and properties
related to rotation are unapplicable for that movcon.
| |
have you bounced this proposal against the LSC? if they could come up with
just one or two ready-to-use .cdl files and - say - a plugin for LDDP where
we part-authors could test the definitions, I would immediately start to
set
up connections for the parts I authored. I also guess a copy of the
actual
PT could collect these parts.
I might totally wrong but I identified the
key-point in a prog which
actually uses the db. as long as we don’t kick
this thing round the room,
it’ll stay all theorical.
|
I’m afraid you are referring to abbreviations I do not know. (LSC, cdl, LDDP,
PT.) For the time being, I showed the proposal to Lugnet and people visiting my
home page only.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
