 | | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
| (...) I think I like the upper version, but I'm not sure. I suppose we can't have both? :-) BTW, we may benefit from using " 1 x 3" rather "3L". This may make it easier to incorporate the L shaped beams. (...) I think there exists a 3 hole full (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | | | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
| (...) :p Sorry, this is a one-name system. Although, after browsing the parts reference at Rene Hoffmeister's site -- (URL) -- I've been wondering about a multi-language parts registry/database. (...) Nod, yes. (...) Yes, there is. It's 32523, and (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
