To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 1349
1348  |  1350
Subject: 
Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Tue, 1 May 2001 11:36:23 GMT
Viewed: 
36 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Fredrik Glöckner writes:
"Sproaticus" <jsproat@io.com> writes:

Give me unofficial parts, I don't care.

I don't think that unofficial parts should be published from LDraw.


Agree - unofficial means they may change - and if the change is to the origin
or orientation then users will get (even more) upset.


How about simply encouraging the parts authors to post their parts to
lugnet.cad.dat.parts?  That way, people can see which parts are in the
pipeline.

I always do,
(http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dat/parts/?q=%2Bnew+%2Bpart+%2Bdee&qn=20) except
maybe bug-fixes, BUT

Besides, people can comment on the quality of the parts, the names, the
numbers and the position.

... I rarely get any comment, good or bad.

And should anybody want to use some of the unofficial parts, they can do so at
their own risk. It's a win win situation.


Ok, so I have made this point a few times already in the past and
virtually noone has responded.


Fredrik

Chris Dee



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
 
(...) That's too bad. I notice your parts, but I rarely comment on them because I'm not into those kind of parts that you model. Your parts are commonly related to minifigs, and I rarely use them. Besides, your parts are nearly always perfect (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
  Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
 
"Chris Dee" <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GCnMwn.Axw@lugnet.com... (...) I've only done one part so far and I've had just 4 comments (1 on an "almost done it" post, 2 on a "done it but no optional lines yet", and 1 by private (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
  Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
 
"Chris Dee" <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GCnMwn.Axw@lugnet.com... (...) Disagree. We package the parts and put a whoppin disclaimer on them. They are not official, just compiled and made easily available. We make it clear that (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
 
(...) I don't think that unofficial parts should be published from LDraw. How about simply encouraging the parts authors to post their parts to lugnet.cad.dat.parts? That way, people can see which parts are in the pipeline. Besides, people can (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

60 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR