 | | Re: MOTM voting for February
|
|
There is an excellent selection this month! It took me about 10 minutes to decide on my vote. Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:G7orCs.7oH@lugnet.com... (...) news:G7oMqH.GtD@lugnet.com... (...) I've (...) for my (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM voting for February
|
|
"Brad Hamilton" <bhamilto1@home.com> wrote in message news:G7pAup.B5u@lugnet.com... (...) Same here! I just have to quit gawking and think 'what will look the best on the front page?' because that's the point of the contest :) -Tim (23 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM voting for February
|
|
(...) That's a nice quote to point out the different POV's between the people running a contest and the people entering the contest. Steve (23 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM voting for February
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:a0p07ts361v0md6...4ax.com... (...) Yeah...I thought of that. Different people see it different ways - I started MOTM to showcase a good 3D rendering on the front page, to display potential (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM voting for February
|
|
Perhaps in the future could could we also have a contest where the actual .dat or .mpd file is available for viewing? I don't think the robotarm stands a very good chance of winning because it's not the best rendering but perhaps a technical (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM voting for February
|
|
"koen" <koen.jordens@studen...ven.ac.be> wrote in message news:G7qFMC.LoA@lugnet.com... (...) Sounds like a good idea, as long as that is a separate contest. Anyone else interested? -Tim (23 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
