 | | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
LOL, I think it'll be totally free from bugs before I have even time to THINK about making new parts ;) Anyways, it's a relief that I don't have to worry about this too at the moment... CYA sometime next summer Cheers NB (18 years ago, 9-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-CA parts rewrite
|
|
(...) Submitted to admins (18 years ago, 8-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts header format validated by the LSC
|
|
Niels Bugge schrieb: (...) You can give my new program DATHeader (Windows) a try to maintain the correct header. First Bug fixes are made, so I think it could be useful for you. cu MikeHeide (18 years ago, 8-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Motion to move the LSC elections: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
|
(...) I have no objections to this change. One thing I would add would be a statement about the fact that the dates may flex a few days in either direction due to the personal schedules (read: real life events) of the site admins. -Orion (18 years ago, 8-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Motion to move the LSC elections: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
|
(...) Thank you Willy for extending the time frames. /Lars (18 years ago, 7-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
