 | | LSC nomination window closes July 15
|
|
Just a reminder ... the nomination window closes end of tomorrow. I think it's fair to base this off of LUGNET server time, which is GMT. -Tim (21 years ago, 14-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Nominees So Far
|
|
(...) Thanks, Kevin! I'll re-post it when the nomination window closes end of tomorrow. -Tim (21 years ago, 14-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Nominees So Far
|
|
(...) Tim, You nominated Paul Gyugyi but he is not on your list. Kevin (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | LSC Nominees So Far
|
|
Here is the status on LSC nominees as of 8/9/03. If there are any corrections, feel free to post them in reply. All are listed alphabetically by last name. Nominees who have accepted nomination: Jacob Sparre Andersen Steve Bliss Kevin Clague Travis (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) Of course. (...) LOL :P -Tim (21 years ago, 9-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) Assuming they comply with the base self selection criteria for LDraw.org membership. (...) Exceptions to rules are a dangerous precedent to set, even when (as in this case) they are done with the best of intentions. :-) (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) I agree. Everyone should be able to vote. (...) Well, I think we could make an exception to the rule on this point ... ;) Steve (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) Well, it's simmered a bit. There's been no outcry one way or another. I think for simplicity's sake, the proposal should change to allow anyone to vote for who is on the LSC, not just those who are LSC eligible. I don't think the stakes are (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
(...) Thank you. I had to think about it for a while, but I've decided to accept the nomination. --Travis Cobbs (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
(...) I've given this some considerable thought and while I think it's important to have a community focused voice on the committee, I have decided to decline this nomination. There are a number of other very well qualified nominees and I'm (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99a
|
|
(...) Nah, that's not true. I've had teeth pulled -- it was easier than getting you to review! ;) Steve (21 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
(...) Thanks, but no thanks, I don't think I can find the time necessary. I find it important to have programmers involved, since they have to parse whatever is being proposed, so I'm glad Michael Lachmann has accepted nomination. I'd like also to (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
(...) Thank you for the nomination. I accept. Michael (21 years ago, 4-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99a
|
|
(...) Works for me. -Tim (21 years ago, 3-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
(...) Thank you for the nomination. I accept. (...) Kevin (21 years ago, 3-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99a
|
|
(...) I agree with Dan that all usable programs that involve non-trivial (read simple text editors) manipulation of DAT Code should qualify --Orion (21 years ago, 3-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
(...) I second and would like to add -- Travis Cobbs -- Tore Eriksson w. (21 years ago, 3-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99a
|
|
(...) I'm not sure. While it's important, it should only rarly drive decisions on the file format. The whole reason you have end user programs is to make dealing with the dats easier. $0.02 Dan (21 years ago, 3-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99a
|
|
Quoting Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com>: (...) I agree - Current rules say I qualifiy, and Steve will tell you, getting me to review is like pulling teeth! :) (21 years ago, 3-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99a
|
|
(...) Yes, it makes sense. I think given this point it's best to keep it to people who have reviewed in the last two updates - what does everyone else think? (...) I'd be inclined to say end user, because they're designing for 'dumb' (or 'dumber') (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
