 | | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) What are you talking about Todd? I for one would like the list mirrored here. -Orion (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) Never mind... It sounds as though the LDraw-tech folks really don't want their list mirrored here. --Todd (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Status of LDDP open source release
|
|
Hello! Some time ago I talked of creating an open source project for LDraw Design Pad , short LDDP. I created a project on sourceforge.net and uploaded the last release to the file system. (URL) know of some people they would be interested to bring (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) I think both LDraw.org and the community at large would benefit from it being mirrored. And another beauty of mirroring an archive like this is that it's so easy to set up that even if there's not a perceived burning need for it, the long-term (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: mailing list linkage
|
|
(...) Oh, that's a good point. Yes, it's a bit long, but as Steve points out, it's a relatively low-interest group. Putting it as .ldraw.tech instead of .ldraw-tech also makes it cleaner if other lists (such as, say, Tim's ldraw-siggraph list) (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) This sounds like a cool idea, but I don't think there's a need for it right now. The techies list is kinda low-interest -- it's good to have a public archive of the list (which we've already got), but I don't see a burning need to mirror it (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: mailing list linkage
|
|
(...) I think lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw.tech is long but it fits in with the existing scheme -Orion (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: mailing list linkage
|
|
(...) Cool. Hmm, which to choose... It makes less work for me doing it the mailing list way, because of the incoming gateway translations at the e-mail level. What do we want to call it here? lugnet.cad.ldraw-tech? lugnet.cad.ldraw.tech? --Todd (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: mailing list linkage
|
|
(...) we can easily also tell mailman to post each email to the mailing list to a group on the NNTP server. Dan (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) I would rephrase that... under the most prevalent current limitation scheme being floated, (LSC eligible==LSC voting eligible) you would not be able to, and I would barely squeak by. Certainly other schemes could be floated, with different (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | mailing list linkage
|
|
(...) Aha -- yes, that would work too -- and is extremely easy to set up. In fact, if you wanted to make it read-only on LUGNET (so that the only way to post is via the mailing list on ldraw.org), all we need to do is subscribe an address (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Building LDGLite for off-screen rendering only (Was: Parts Tracker Status)
|
|
[ XFUT lugnet.cad.dev ] (...) So far it works fine, but ... (...) This fails. Here's the end of the output from the build: ---...--- gcc -g -DUNIX -DUSE_OPENGL -DUSE_L3_PARSER -DUSE_BMP8 -DNEED_MIN_MAX -DUSE_PNG -DTILE_RENDER_OPTION -DOSMESA_OPTION (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw-tech Mailing List/Update
|
|
(...) (URL) is the archives. -Tim (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | LDraw-tech Mailing List/Update
|
|
Everyone - I noted the existance of the LDraw-tech mailing list in this LDraw.org article: (URL) never noted it on LUGNET. So... While we were recovering from the downtime, Dan and Steve set up the tech mailing list, to keep everyone involved on (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker Status (offscreen part rendering)
|
|
(...) Or you could build and link with static versions of the Mesa libraries. Then you just have to worry about the one executable. In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Don Heyse writes: (...) Ok, I tried this and it seems to work. Here's how: Grab the (...) (21 years ago, 15-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) I see your points and agree with 2 and 3, but only partially with 1. Anyways, there's about equal response for or against limitations. Not totally sure on what to do - I'll let it simmer for a bit. (I should note that if there was no (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
|
(...) I'd much rather have one reasonably decent method, then several different methods. Steve (21 years ago, 10-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) You must not go to the same places I do for vacation. Public terminals? Not where I've been. OTOH, if we're going to play the vacation game, some people go for longer than 2 weeks. Heck, some people are basically offline all summer. I'd say a (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
|
(...) I feel voting for LSC members should be open to the general group. I've got 2 reasons for this: 1. I trust people enough that they'll deal with their own capabilities for discernment in this area. 2. I don't want to have to sort out who gets (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Renaming Gaming group
|
|
(...) Sure (...) It's easier to move 2 or 3 groups at once than separately. . . . what remapping would you suggest? --Todd (21 years ago, 10-May-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
