 | | LCD draft spec comment —Stefan Gustavson
|
| | | Nothing much seems to be happening with the LCD spec, but I read it through and have a comment, in case anyone is listening. If not, at least this lands in the archives. The "stud inlet" and the "turnable stud inlet" should not be distinguished in (...) (21 years ago, 20-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LCD draft spec comment —Daniel Bennett
|
| | | | (...) Hi I am currently working on my own version of LCD. (URL) was thinking of adding some kind over-ride to the angle of movement for each connection. This clinches it, I will. The format itself could hold single-studs that lock at 90 degrees or (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LCD draft spec comment —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) would find most useful is technic axle in it's hole - there's quite a significant clearance between them. Not sure the best way to handle such things. ROSCO (21 years ago, 22-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LCD draft spec comment —Stefan Gustavson
|
| | | | (...) If this is a feature that is used deliberately and often enough to motivate a software model for it, it would be possible to encode a combination of hard constraints, demonstrating the normal and preferred connection method, and additional (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| | | | |
