 | | Re[2]: I have read the article about LCD
|
|
Hi all, hello Damien! DG> This thread is not very frequented now. DG> May be because the debate has to become much more technical. Yes, there is not so many traffic here nowadays. We knew this will be a long project because it's a big project with (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | Re: I have read the article about LCD
|
|
Hello Láng Attila D. and Hello Kiss Attila Csongor, This thread is not very frequented now. May be because the debate has to become much more technical. (...) I mean if LMPL is not sufficient, we are in danger to either add more and more syntax (...) (24 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | Re: I have read the article about LCD
|
|
(...) What are you meaning by multiple syntax levels, Damien? (...) Let me report that LMPL is almost ready. It is going to be published soon. (...) LMPL contains these in theory. (...) Of course we should. (...) Well, this seems to be usable. In (...) (24 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | I have read the article about LCD
|
|
I have read the article about LCD. The primary usage of an LCad library is to provide many quality virtual parts. So the future of LDraw library is more and better parts. The primary usage of an LCad tool is to select and position virtual parts. So (...) (24 years ago, 24-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | Re: Re[2]: Movement and friction
|
|
(...) I agree. Although I called it friction, I didn't mean the true physical property. It seems to me that the difference between grey pins and black pins is structural in nature: they are different connectors from a builder's point of view. I (...) (24 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | Re[2]: Movement and friction
|
|
Earlier on Mon, 28 Jan 2002 23:28:01 GMT on lugnet.cad.dev Ross Crawford<rcrawford@csi.com> wrote: ---...--- RC> I can see one limitation - the fact that technic axles are actually RC> significantly smaller than the holes in the bricks (round holes, (...) (24 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | Re: Movement and friction
|
|
I haven't commented substantially on LCD, so maybe I should. I am contemplating an algorithm that will find all of the possible stud-insertion points on a part. The obvious way to do this is to recognize the tube or enclosing box with their (...) (24 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | Re: Movement and friction
|
|
(...) I think it probably is. The situations I'm thinking about are: 1. axles in technic bricks, which fit your "no friction" model; 2. the light grey low-friction pins, which could also fit the "no friction" model (with regard rotation); 3. the (...) (24 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | Re: Movement and friction
|
|
(...) I think it probably is. The situations I'm thinking about are: 1. axles in technic bricks, which fit your "no friction" model; 2. the light grey low-friction pins, which could also fit the "no friction" model (with regard rotation); 3. the (...) (24 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
| |
| | Re: Movement and friction
|
|
(...) Welcome in my brain, Barney: I was writing about gravity and inertia in this very hour. The approach you describe may be usable, but as for myself, I'm talking in the LMPL proposal about a tensile strength instead. I see some difference. (...) (24 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.lcd)
|
