Subject:
|
Re: Ghost bug in 3.11
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 Nov 2004 18:47:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1821 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.mlcad, Don Heyse wrote:
> > I'm a bit lost here. Are you talking about using ldglite to render
> > image files, or render interactively? I ask because -mf and -mF
> > ignore all STEP commands, but only for the non-interactive image file
> > generating usage. There is a -D command (that was added to a later
> > version of ldlite) to set the subfile level at which to ignore STEP
> > commands. See Version 2.3 Release Notes here.
> >
> > http://ldlite.sourceforge.net/
>
> I use -mF so I don't go spastic with the render window poping up and
> down each time I invoke ldglite and it finishes. This non-interactive
> render ignores all steps. I'm sure LPub has handled and removed all
> the CLEAR statements in the process of creating a step DAT. In this
> scenario, I see no need to use the -D.
I cool with that. It's a whole lot easier for me to make ldglite
behave well as a unseen simple renderer, and let LPub handle all the
tricky instruction formating macros. The only reason I can see for
me to add internal ldglite support for all this stuff is for people
who can't, or won't use LPub. Once the LPub source code it out there,
I can't imagine there'll be too many of them left.
> > I suppose it could make sense to use the -D command to also control
> > the subfile level at which to ignore CLEAR, and perhaps other
> > instruction formatting macros like ROTSTEP and such. I'm a bit fuzzy
> > on how well I incorporated the -D code from ldlite into ldglite,
> > especially with the L3 parser. I suppose I should test it with both
> > parsers and see how well it extends to the other meta commands. I
> > don't think there's much actual code involved.
>
> Don't bother doing it for me.
OK. That was easy.
Don
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Ghost bug in 3.11
|
| (...) time I invoke ldglite and it finishes. This non-interactive render ignores all steps. I'm sure LPub has handled and removed all the CLEAR statements in the process of creating a step DAT. In this scenario, I see no need to use the -D. (...) (...) (20 years ago, 3-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
