Subject:
|
Re: LDBoxer - Next Step and My Datsville Plans
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:49:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1415 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Willy Tschager wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Tore Eriksson wrote:
>
> [Lot of snippage]
>
> > While "boxing" all Datsville's buildings - this is a very time-consuming job,
> > even with the automatic and semiautomatic tools! - I want your input on the idea
> > of the planned two new simplification levels.
> >
> > Let's say we call it A when top studs are removed and B when bottom studs/tubes
> > are removed (think: Above and Below)
> > Should we have the structure:
> >
> > Parts\B
> > Parts\B\A
> > Parts\B\B
> >
> > or
> >
> > Parts\B
> > Parts\BA
> > Parts\BB
> > or anything better?
> >
> > I think the first alternative is a little better. Or does anyone have a yet
> > better idea?
> >
> > I really appreciate your input.
>
> hi tore,
>
> with the release of MLCad 3.10 there are now at least two progs who support
> custom folders. instead of messing up my PARTS\ and P\ folder I wish I could
> define something like BOXER\B\ ...
That's not a bad idea, but the advantage of messing up the PARTS\ folder is that
no extra adjustment or setup will be required.
> did this discussion http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/?n=9485 lead to a happing
> ending? what did the cod-gods agree on?
>
> w.
"121 Messages in This Thread" - It's very hard for anyone who did not
participate in the discussion to find any agreement - if any was made...
/Tore
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LDBoxer - Next Step and My Datsville Plans
|
| (...) Well, I tried to pull you into the discussion at least twice, by mentioning your boxer subdirectories, but no luck. (URL) think some sort of consensus *was* reached and Lars was working on some reference code to handle it. But I have to admit, (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LDBoxer - Next Step and My Datsville Plans
|
| In lugnet.cad.dev, Tore Eriksson wrote: [Lot of snippage] (...) hi tore, with the release of MLCad 3.10 there are now at least two progs who support custom folders. instead of messing up my PARTS\ and P\ folder I wish I could define something like (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
