Subject:
|
Should *all* studs use a STUD primitive?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 Mar 2004 20:24:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1393 times
|
| |
|
|
I'm in the process of updating my LDList program, including stud count as a
searchable parameter. During tests I have found a couple of parts that have
studs, but are not using any STUD primitive, and for this reason LDList
cannot find them :-(
At least the following parts have studs, but don't use a STUD primitive
(inlined studs?):
208.dat
476.dat
577.dat
3626bp00.dat
Comments?
--
Anders Isaksson, Sweden
BlockCAD: http://w1.161.telia.com/~u16122508/proglego.htm
Gallery: http://w1.161.telia.com/~u16122508/gallery/index.htm
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Should *all* studs use a STUD primitive?
|
| (...) primitives. Maybe the authors (Matt Schild, Franklin Cain, Steve Bliss) could comment. Rather than 3626bp00, which is not an official part, I think you mean s/3626bs00 which does have an inlined stud. I think this should be fixed too. Chris (20 years ago, 27-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
