To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 8448
8447  |  8449
Subject: 
Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Sun, 16 Mar 2003 03:41:30 GMT
Viewed: 
1953 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Kevin Clague writes:
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tim Courtney writes:
In lugnet.cad.dev, Orion Pobursky writes:
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tim Courtney writes:
<snip>
If we want to encourage other programmers to volunteer and write programs
for the LDraw system, what exists now needs to be clearly documented.

I think we need to put a lock on the creation of any new commands until we
can properly document the existing commands.  This will prevent the overlap
of functionality.

I agree.

I don't see how a lock is practical.  We don't even have an official
standards body yet.  I don't know how you would enforce it any way.

Right. Sorry -- my support of that was on a quick response, brain fart I
suppose.

My goal in making the call was to document what is there, so that people:
a) don't produce name space collisions
b) don't reinvent the wheel
c) have examples of ways to create meta-commands
d) gain some philosophies for knowing how to create new meta-commands in the
future.
e) motivate people to look to the list and the community for guidance when
creating new meta-commands.

Good goals we should all focus on.

I've been truding through the list of search matches in CAD for
meta-command, and it has been very interesting reading.  We've already had
the creation of new meta-commands that are now depricated (e.g. BFC).  We've
also had at least one LDraw file format super-set created with ldlite.
We've also had some proposals for the successors to the LDraw file format
(they seem to have died though.)  This "call for meta-commands" is also not
the first attempt at a comprehensive list of meta-commands.

Yup, not the first time. I do think we should work through this, stay on
task, and get it right this time though.

-Tim



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
 
(...) I don't see how a lock is practical. We don't even have an official standards body yet. I don't know how you would enforce it any way. My goal in making the call was to document what is there, so that people: a) don't produce name space (...) (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

154 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR