 | | Re: A solution to the part numbering problem? (Was: vote 9902)
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Selçuk <teyyareci> <sgore@nospam.superonline.com> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Datum: vrijdag 26 maart 1999 16:12 Onderwerp: Re: A solution to the part numbering problem? (Was: vote 9902) (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Complete list of metacommands?
|
|
I am trying to get a complete list of the type 0 metacommands and this is what I currently have, if people can let me know the ones that I am missing that would be fantastic. Standard LDraw metacommands (see (URL) STEP - Marks the end of the (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with JJ Memorial
|
|
(...) I've maintained a local copy of the original archives on my mirror for the l-cad parts updates for a long time now. (URL) yesterday morning with the new 9902 update and the new complete.exe (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts DESPERATLY wanted (steve: please read)
|
|
(...) When my kinfolk (1) try this trick on me, they very quickly find themselves in a different room (or if I can help it, a different building) from where I am. They have learned that this tactic of begging brings exactly the opposite of what they (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw part update 9902
|
|
(...) I agree, and I also want to extend a Thank You to Todd, Terry, Steve, Leo and others too numerous to mention for their generous contributions to the LEGO community. It is frusterating sometimes to have to wait for the latest update in any (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: A solution to the part numbering problem? (Was: vote 9902)
|
|
Wow...How nice. I really like this idea. I have been always behind the idea of separating those two universe, but couldn't realise that they could be both "separate" and "together" at the same time. Nice and elegant solution in my side. What's you (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: vote 9902
|
|
Terrel, I'm sorry that I forgotten to mention in my last message, but if has any use for anyone (from misunderstanding point of view) I never intended to blame anyone, especially you. I believe you have the one having one of the greatest portions (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Touch Sensor
|
|
(...) IMHO this numbering method makes no sense at all !! First, the 3 parts are not separable and makes no sense using them separated. LEGO decided to number them like if it was a _single_ part and have put the 32025 number in the _main_ part which (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw part update 9902
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com>; lugnet.cad@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad@lugnet.com> Date: vrijdag 26 maart 1999 3:23 Subject: LDraw part update 9902 Terry, I've (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | A solution to the part numbering problem? (Was: vote 9902)
|
|
(...) What about adding a "reference" catalog to the LDraw tree? It should be used for LDraw files with _exact_ part-number relations. The name could be "LDraw\LEGO", "LDraw\Official", or "LDraw\Reference" (the last is too long). Parts like the six (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
