Subject:
|
Glass... to BFC or not to BFC?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:42:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
361 times
|
| |
|
|
When authoring "glass" parts, should I include BFC statements?
It seems like we wouldn't want to cull because all surfaces should be
visible from any direction. On the other hand, BFC is a performance
optimization and transparent surfaces are generally a bigger perf hit than
other surfaces.
--
Tony Hafner
www.hafhead.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Glass... to BFC or not to BFC?
|
| (...) They require a different approach to optimization - visibility culling, not backface culling. You're right in thinking they should not be BFC. The exception I think might be a full box - which gets composited twice in a polygon system like (...) (22 years ago, 25-Nov-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
