Subject:
|
Re: Cylinder Primitive conditional lines
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 08:47:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
313 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Orion Pobursky writes:
> I noticed that some of the fraction cylinder primitives (1-8, 2-4, 3-4, 3-8)
> are missing a conditional line at one end. The 1-4 cylinder has type 5
> lines at both ends. Is there any reason for the missing type 5 line? If
> so, why? Is there any reason the missing type 5 line can't be added? If
> not, why? If it is decided that the missing type 5 line can be added, I'm
> willing to do the work. The reason I'm asking is that the missing type 5
> line seems to be a frequent cause of hold votes on the PT lately.
I noticed the same for fraction cone primitives (1-4).
I have created a simple Excel Spreadsheet to create cone primitives
with any radius (outer = inner + 1). I have only uploaded some 4-4
cone primitives to the PT because I was unsure of the amount of type
5 lines in the 1-4 fractions.
If I understand it right, type 5 lines should be at both ends.
(In case of the P-folder (not P\48) primitives: 4 segments, 5 optional lines)
Is there any need for a full range of cone primitives (both 1-4 and 4-4)?
Niels
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Cylinder Primitive conditional lines
|
| I noticed that some of the fraction cylinder primitives (1-8, 2-4, 3-4, 3-8) are missing a conditional line at one end. The 1-4 cylinder has type 5 lines at both ends. Is there any reason for the missing type 5 line? If so, why? Is there any reason (...) (22 years ago, 31-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
