Subject:
|
Re: Subtle parts differences (was Re: Lego Blueprints Query ...)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:15:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1270 times
|
| |
|
|
Thanks for the feedback Chris. I'd be interested to see scans of the bricks
that you described. If you could either email them to me directly or send
me a link, then I'll take a look and update my info as appropriate.
I have a load of stuff (slopes mostly) to rephotograph with my new macro
capable camera, so hope to add similar levels of detail for those shortly.
If there is a particularly hot topic (ie 2x2 round brick), then I would be
willing to document and photograph the variations found by the group and put
them online in a similar format.
Cheers
SteveScott
"Chris Dee" <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Gq8x55.38E@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.loc.uk, Chris Dee writes:
> > In lugnet.loc.uk, Steve Scott writes:
> > > Has anybody seen anything resembling these Lego Blueprints before? • Although
> > > there is no date on them I reckon that they date back to about 1960 +/- • a
> > > couple of years.
> > >
> > > http://www.honeygram.com/legobits/scans
> > >
> > > Also, re the recent discussion about the Weetabix sets, I have put up a
> > > boxshot and instruction scans from the house set in case anyone wants to
> > > have a look. Use the link above and select "rare sets" from the menu on • the
> > > left.
> > >
> > > If you've any spare time left, have a close look at the studs on your • 45deg
> > > inverted slope bricks :)
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > SteveScott
> >
> > Very impressed with the detail you have gone into on the slope bricks. We • could
> > do with more of this kind of information for other parts - see the thread • at
> > http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/org/ldraw/?n=1639, regarding the 2x2 round
> > brick, which has at least 5 versions.
> >
> > The 2x2 45deg inverted slope _does_ exist with the coarse stipple. I have • not
> > checked all my copies of this part, but of the two I found quickly, both • have
> a
> > round pillar in the underside well, but are different in other respects.
> >
> > Version A (red) : birthmark on end of underside pillar, thick-walled • tubes
> > Version B (white) : birthmark on one stud, thinish walled tubes (not as • thin
> as
> > the modern version), no gap between hollow studs and side walls.
> >
> > If you want some help with this project (in the form of scans of these • parts
> or
> > a search of my spares), email me and I'll see what I can do.
> >
> > Copied and moved to lugnet.cad, as this is where these discussions seem • to
> > congregate.
> >
> > Chris
> > chris_w_dee@hotmail.com
>
> Just changed subject to clarify relevance for lugnet.cad.dev readers.
>
> Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
2 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
