 | | Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
| Since there hasn't been discussion of this topic, and more than two weeks have elapsed, can we assume that: A) The proposed revision is acceptable B) The proposed revision is un-acceptable C) No one knows LMKWYT, Steve (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
| (...) C! But it does not seem completely unacceptable to me. Play well, Jacob (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
| (...) A: I like it. -Chuck (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
