 | | Color question
|
|
Still on the 200101 update: I noticed that 3297P90 (slope with classic space pattern) had some polys with color 18. Isn't it an illegal color code or did I miss a discussion and now it's valid ? The FAQ doesn't say anything about being able to use (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDR - New LDraw File Extension
|
|
Tim Courtney wrote... (...) L3P accepts any extension. The only special feature is, that if your model is called MODEL.DAT or MODEL.MPD you can leave out the extension and just type "l3p MODEL". This will of course also apply to MODEL.LDR from the (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDR - New LDraw File Extension
|
|
"Rui Martins" <Rui.Martins@Link.pt> wrote in message news:3C0BB8B1.803010...Link.pt... (...) No, for now parts stay .DAT. (...) It isn't as big of a deal as you are making it out to be. I've had many discussions with Steve about this, and he (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDR - New LDraw File Extension
|
|
(...) This is Not exactly required! (...) Yes, but it will break compatibility, with older programs. (...) Don't really know. (...) So, the actual goal, of switching to an unambigous extension, doesn't really work, because, everybody, must keep (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDR - New LDraw File Extension
|
|
Hello, (...) its (...) LEdit can be changed. I did it myself. Just patch the extension with a hex-editor from .DAT to LDR. No reverse-engineering necessary ;)) Greetings Carsten (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Daily News
|
|
(...) Try searching for '2599*' or 'flipper*'. Partsref doesn't do partial-word matches by default. Steve (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: ldglite 0.9.4
|
|
(...) Yuck. I'm not allocating anything really HUGE on the stack. Plus I can't think of a good way to check in C if a stack allocation fails. On the other hand, the offscreen image buffer IS huge, but that's allocated on the heap, and I do check to (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldglite 0.9.4
|
|
(...) Hmmm... I tried in Bash, and suddenly it worked. Tried again in Tcsh, and it didn't work. Ran `limit stacksize unlimited` and tried again. Then it worked. Apparently you allocate some data on the stack without checking if the allocation (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDR - New LDraw File Extension
|
|
ahhhhh, ok that exlains it. thanks! Gary Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:GnrB9B.7yC@lugnet.com... (...) more (...) not (...) for (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDR - New LDraw File Extension
|
|
"Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:GnrB9B.7yC@lugnet.com... (...) more (...) I forgot to add, DAT will always be compatible, and should always be compatible. LEdit has .DAT hard-coded (and we have not found a copy of its source (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
