 | | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
(...) Yes! I agree that would be really nice! Also, is there a way for authors to get the email of revievers? If a reviewer leaves a comment the author doesn't understand, they need to be able to clarify it. (...) Many hands make light work! ROSCO (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting Reviewers (was: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News))
|
|
(...) Not at this time. It's been brought up that perhaps the list of reviewers should be made public (although I'm not so sure about publishing their email addresses). Would everyone agree that a list of the names of reviewers should be put up on (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting Reviewers (was: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News))
|
|
(...) I personally don't mind, but I wouldn't want to speak for anyone else. (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting Reviewers (was: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News))
|
|
(...) One way to get around the publishing emails problem is to provide a link against each vote / comment, which brings up a screen with a message field. When you submit the form, it sends email to the chosen reviewer, with subject "re: LDraw parts (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting Reviewers (was: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News))
|
|
(...) I would not agree to it, I get too much junk mail as it is. :) (...) I was think along this line as well. If the tracker keeps "track" of who submitted the part file, it could email the comments directly to the submitter. - or - A check box (...) (23 years ago, 1-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
