 | | Re: More parts feedback
|
| (...) I agree with that. It would be a lot more sensible. And I like the original names for the Link Chain/Tread pieces. So, what do we like? with End Links / Holes / End Connectors? Or is there a nomenclature even more apt out there? -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 6-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: More parts feedback
|
| Terry K wrote in message <36e0b4c1.2353492@lu...et.com>... (...) The problem with "Holes" is that it is used for many things and is only marginally descriptive. How about something like one of the following: 2637.DAT Technic Axle 16 with End Pin (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: More parts feedback
|
| (...) Me too. If we stick to "3873.DAT Technic Chain Tread" now, we can always add "0.6 x 2.6" later if there appears a new tread link later, can we not? (...) Out of the three, I prefer 2637.DAT Technic Axle 16 with End Connectors because the part (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
