 | | Re: Who are 'ldraw.org'? (was: Parts license) —Leonardo Zide
| | | | (...) I think that would be the best solution. IIRC, GPL doesn't have any organizations mentioned (maybe they say something about the FSF), it's a direct agreement between users and authors. Why don't we simply use GPL or LGPL ? Leonardo (24 years ago, 23-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Who are 'ldraw.org'? (was: Parts license) —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) Like I (just now) replied to Larry, this situation is a bit different, because ldraw.org/LCAD would also be brokering the agreements between contributors and users. I'm not sure that can be done, without having some recognition (in the (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | |
