 | | Re: Who are 'ldraw.org'? (was: Parts license) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Right. But we'd be building cloud castles without it. (...) What if someone declines to accept? What if someone modifies that license slightly? With a structure and an org you have the power to reject. I think this sort of license (IANAL!!!!!) (...) (24 years ago, 23-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Who are 'ldraw.org'? (was: Parts license) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) But isn't the GPL a case of GNU throwing out some verbiage and saying, 'OK, here's an example, use it or modify or whatever', and authors/publishers actually copying the license, and putting it on their own work. It's not like GNU is brokering (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who are 'ldraw.org'? (was: Parts license) —Leonardo Zide
|
| | | | (...) I think one of the points of creating GPL was to have a 'brokering party' available for everyone who wants to use it. There's no need to modify anything. Here's an paragraph from the GPL: 10. If you wish to incorporate parts of the Program (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
