 | | Re: Non-TLG Parts —Tim Courtney
| | | | (...) You did a good job of it, though I don't think you'll like the replies from people (personal prediction). (...) I would personally severely disapprove. Though it could be argued to include clone bricks (which your described part would fall (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Non-TLG Parts —Tim Courtney
| | | | | | (...) :) Um, I didn't know there was a thing out there for MOC bricks.. interesting... (...) Yep, I don't mean any offense either, and I agree with you Todd. (...) Another good idea.. group, lets keep the creative juices flowing.. Ldraw Consortium? (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Non-TLG Parts —Todd Lehman
| | | | | (...) So would I (personally). (...) Me too. In fact, I would take a stronger position against clone bricks than against purely-MOC bricks. This isn't to suggest that every official TLG element is a fragrant flower, but IMHO all clone elements are (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | |
