 | | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01 —Fredrik Glöckner
| | | | (...) Sounds good to me! (...) I think they should be combined. We don't have that many propellers/rotors anyway. Besides, it is probably better to put them in the same category, as the user will spend less time searching for individual parts. (...) (25 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01 —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) Cool. I'll look at the other propellors (note LDraw-spelling) and rotors to see if their names can be adjusted to match. (...) True, but what category? The differences between propellors and rotors are small (for our purposes), but the (...) (25 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01 —Fredrik Glöckner
| | | | | (...) While there is a strong difference in the real world, the difference if fairly small in the LEGO world. Take 6041.dat, for example, which is, like you said, a boat propellor. But you will find this one on many "aircraft" like official (...) (25 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | |
