 | | Re: (Some) Parts which are in the update-pipeline
|
|
(...) My mistake. It is the 3 point crystal that is being voted on. (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Hunt for missing primitives
|
|
(...) after (...) Steve memory is excelent, he has drawn the complete picture. My brand new computer(1)didn't have Ldraw on it jet, and I've just tested the Ldraw.exe and Complete.exe downloads on it. The 3 primitives BOX4-1.DAT, BOX4-4A.DAT and (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldglite is now homeless
|
|
(...) I never said that CVS is a bad thing, it allows you to retrieve the source code for specific versions and have a backup in another place besides floppy disks. :) But it's not very useful if you're working alone. (...) I used to update the CVS (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Smoke-Clear color code
|
|
(...) According to my understanding of the color codes, this would be "40" (that is, 8 for Dark-Grey, plus 32 for transparency). Thanks, Franklin (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) I believe that's why I have drawn "overdraw3.png" ! ;) (...) Damn, I missed that one, but just need to split the pentagon into a quad and a triangle. (...) As I said, the disc as only 8 slices to simplify, with the regular 16 you would save (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Hunt for missing primitives
|
|
Imre, If I remember correctly, the 'BOX4_1.DAT' errors were noticed very shortly after the 98-07 update was released, and Terry replaced that update with a fixed version. I just downloaded LCAD9807.EXE and COMPLETE.EXE from www.ldraw.org, and both (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: (Some) Parts which are in the update-pipeline
|
|
(...) No, it isn't. The color-16 version is also in the backlog: (...) Steve (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: the parts 754.dat and 756.dat in the 8.5L hose
|
|
(...) That's correct. As long as I think it's ok, it goes into the update. I saw your message in my partsref inbox, but I haven't processed it yet. Steve (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with BFC
|
|
(...) I've looked at your files, and they seem to be OK. But it was a manual review, I didn't calculate the determinants of the transform reference matrices. At this point, it looks like a bug in the MLCad code. We'll have to wait to see if Michael (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Hunt for missing primitives
|
|
(...) I don't think I have this one... (...) I *do* have these. In fact, I used box4_1.dat yesterday...should I have called it something different? (...) This isn't a good solution, as the problem probably exists on many machines using LDraw... (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
