 | | Syntax error in official part 754.dat? —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | Hi, I just noticed that L3Lab interpreted the following lines as real lines, not as comments: 01 16 0 -2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ring3.dat 01 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ring3.dat I sent a mail to Lars to notify him of this small "bug", but then it (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Syntax error in official part 754.dat? —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) There was a discussion about this awhile ago. Since LDraw will interpret these lines as subfile commands, the lines are syntactically correct. Badly formed, but not invalid. And 754.dat is getting fixed in the 2000-01 update! Steve (25 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Syntax error in official part 754.dat? —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | (...) It is? Do you mean that the "strange" comment syntax I pointed out will be fixed? Or will you fix something else also? Fredrik (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Syntax error in official part 754.dat? —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) The 'strange' syntax will be fixed. Those lines will be deleted. Steve (25 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
