To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 4483
4482  |  4484
Subject: 
Parts voting comments
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Sat, 15 Apr 2000 21:31:22 GMT
Viewed: 
493 times
  
Hi everyone

Here are some comments on the parts i have look at.

x552 - 32199
On the new primitive axlehole8.dat 4 optional lines are missing. But they are already missing on axle.dat, axlehole3.dat primitives.
And they are ok on Axle 2 notched. (Hey Steve, it's only a detail :) )
I think we should decide if we need to get those 4 optional lines on all the axle primitives or if there is no use to put them, due
to the fact the axle is often small in a model.

2717
great work Tore...
I think some optional lines are missing (under the hands of the fig who sit in - i don't know the word in english !).

With all the discussions on BFC it could be intersting to make the new parts and primitives. BFC compatible. I think we should do
that before making those parts officials.

Damien


Damien et Nathalie Duquennoy
26, rue du belvédère
69210 L'ARBRESLE
dduquenn@club-internet.fr
http://perso.club-internet.fr/dduquenn/



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Parts voting - 2717
 
(...) Thanks! (...) I think I corrected this issue. Maybe I never sent the updated file to Steve...? /Tore (24 years ago, 16-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR