 | | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01 —Steve Bliss
| | | | (...) I could redo the part, slicing it into sections that are 4LDU long. To properly package, this, each distinct/unique section should be made into a subpart file, and the main part files would be a list of these subparts. Taking this approach, (...) (24 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01 —Fredrik Glöckner
| | | | | (...) It would probably be good enough to keep the "tip" in one, non-bendable part. Sure, I can think of situations where one would put only the outer part of the tip into something, causing the other part to bend. But that would probably be quite (...) (24 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01 —Steve Bliss
| | | | | I posted an updated TFA11 to (URL). Geez, I wish I could follow hyperlinks within my newsreader. There are some mistakes in the part, but the posting was mostly to look at how the main file was constructed, not the subfile details. (...) OK, I made (...) (24 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01 —Fredrik Glöckner
| | | | | (...) I think there are a few mistakes in that file. I posted a corrected version which looks good on my system. (...) Yeah, that's a good point. You'll do whatever you want on the issue of splitting the central part of the hose or not, I don't care (...) (24 years ago, 15-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | | |
